Before the 21st Century, in the old geology, scientists had many different names for what they thought the configurations of continents were at various time periods.
They called these different configurations names like Pangaea, Luarasia, Gondwana, Rodinia, Pannotia, Vaalbara, Ur, Kenorland and many other names. Each with its own unique name for these landmasses, characterizing what they thought the Earth was like at that time
Now that we know that planets are stars in different stages of evolution, thanks to Stellar Metamorphosis, we understand that Earth looked very different in the past. If you saw Earth billions of years ago it would be totally unrecognizable. At various stages in the past, Earth probably looked like Neptune, and like Jupiter before that, a brown dwarf, a red dwarf, etc., before that.
To me it seems odd to go back to when Earth looked like Neptune, and still call it "Earth". In light of Stellar Metamorphosis, it seems like "Earth" is just a name for one stage of stellar metamorphosis for a star that had a much richer and varied history than anyone ever imagined.
In Stellar Metamorphosis, we are talking about metamorphosis. It would be odd if we had a word for a butterfly, but once we found out that caterpillars turn into butterflies, we still used the same name, "butterfly" to refer to caterpillars. In this analogy, I don't just mean terminology, but the actual names of stars.
An understanding of Stellar Metamorphosis changes our understanding of the world and the Universe so much! This change in understanding naturally leads to a need for new terminology and new naming systems in our language. In order to update our understanding of the Universe in light of Stellar Metamorphosis, it is also necessary to update our language. This was lacking in the static, conventional, consensus based science of the 20th Century.
As we update our understanding of the Universe, we must update our language accordingly.
I would like to propose some names that can be used when discussing various stages of stellar metamorphosis.
For example, when discussing the star named Earth when it was in a Neptunian stage, I find it convenient to call this star "Poseidon". Of course we know that it was the same star, but at this stage of metarmorphosis, the characteristics were so different that it is deserving of a new name.
Similarly, when Mars was at an earlier stage of stellar metamorphosis, perhaps still having oceans and a thicker atmosphere, I find it convenient to name this stage of the star "Ares".
For Mercury, the Roman equivelent of Mercury is Hermes, so why not the name "Hermes" for the name of this star when it was at an earlier stage of stellar metamorphosis?
So, with this new naming convention, at earlier times, there were the astrons Poseidon, Ares, Hermes and Aphrodite.
In a similar fashion, we can think back to when the Moon was different, perhaps with a thicker atmosphere, and water on its surface. Or perhaps something different from this. Either way, it would be convenient to have a name for this previous stage of stellar metamorphosis for the Moon. This name is already closely associated with the Moon, so I propose the name "Apollo".
As we go back in time, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune were hot plasmatic suns. I am suggesting the name "Orpheus" for when Jupiter was a hot bright plasmatic star. I would also like to suggest the names "Anu" for Saturn, "Horus" for Neptune, and "Osiris" for Uranus when they were hot, bright suns.
When a sun transforms into a red dwarf star, which may go through a flare star stage, the erythrian phase, I suggest the convention of adding "Ra" to the name - named after the Egyptian deity affiliated with the red noon-day Sun.
So for example, Orpheus, Orpheus-Ra. Osiris, Osiris-Ra. Anu, Anu-Ra. Horus, Horus-Ra. For the Sun, in the future: Sol, Sol-Ra.
Some of these names could be convenient for updated names of Geological Eons. For example, back when Earth was Poseidon, instead of the "Archean" or "Hadean" we can call it the Poseidian Eon, or a naming convention based on whether there is a host star or not.
So for example, if we use the root word "arch" or "archon" for host, derived from the word for "lord" or "ruler" we could have the Helioarchic Eon for when The Sun is the host. Prior to this period, the Anarchonic Eon for when there was no host, and before that, the Prearchonic Eon. etc.
A naming convention for Geological time periods which takes into account both the stage of metamorphosis of the Earth and the Host at the time could be convenient, so that maybe instead you would have something like the Helioarchic Eon and the Poseidian Phase.
Here are the rest of my proposed naming conventions for the Sun, The Moon and the major planets of the solar system:
The Sun
(Sol, Helios)
Sol --> Sol-Ra aka "Phoenix" --> Leviathan (Jovian stage)
Mercury:
Hera --> Hera-Ra --> Perseus (Jovian stage) -->Hermes
--> Hephaestus (transitional Chthonic stage)--> Mercury
Venus:
Aurora --> Aurora-Ra --> Persephone (Jovian stage) --> Aphrodite
--> Venus --> Ishtar --> Athena (Mercurian stage)
Earth
(Gaia)
Astra --> Astra-Ra --> Odin --> Poseidon --> Earth --> Terra
--> Artemis (Mercurian stage)
The Moon
(Luna)
Helena --> Helena-Ra --> Hercules (Jovian stage) --> Dionysus
-->Apollo --> The Moon / Luna
Mars
Ara --> Ara-Ra --> Zeus (Jovian stage)--> Proteus --> Protares
--> Ares --> Mars --> Achilles (Mercurian stage)
Jupiter
Orpheus --> Orpheus-Ra --> Jupiter --> Veltune --> Varuna
Saturn
Anu --> Anu-Ra (aka Anubis) --> Saturn --> Turan -->Shiva
Uranus
Osiris --> Osiris-Ra --> Caelus --> Uranus --> Zera
Neptune
Horus --> Horus - Ra --> Cronus --> Neptune --> Vea
No comments:
Post a Comment